Scott Horne: "Though a flaming atheist myself ..." Such pathetic emptiness; such a pathetic need to sully and degrade everything they touch, even prayer, Benham and Horne are straining the limits of decent tolerance.
Mr Horne's self-description, "[t]hough a flaming atheist myself" ("flaming" indeed!!!) and the ex-American's silly affectation of British spellings (come on Horne, you were born, you attended school, were educated in the United States!!!), the nouveau-Canadian puts on aires and reinvents himself so pathetically to be Canadian or British, or something he's not--regardless of the artificiality of his 'becoming' Canadian, etc.-- is particularly pathetic. Horne's affectations (Affectations can be dangerous.—Gertrude Stein, right Mr Benham?) are hilarious! Now who's the "merken"?
And the co-conspirators' are sharing the expression "royal plural" (Right, Terry?) which is about as transparent as fiberglas (and just as artificial and plastic). It's a circus of apes! A sock-puppet performance! One starts a poll, the other two jump in and mouth some hominid sounds, and another hystrionic apelette (you, Jane) chimes in. Brilliant! Brilliant only if one is choreographing a public toilet.
Horne, who has somehow reinvented himself to be French--or something of that ilk (No, Mr Luckacovic, "ilk" does not mean "predator". Your friend, Horne is more of the buzzard type, not a falcon.)--, refers to "some goddam Anglo moron"and "ignorant Christers", reveals his true [lack of] character: a vile, empty, irreverent, shell of a being. In fact, Horne's words reminisce of all the evils of suppression of freedom of conviction and the free exchange of ideas of all the failed atheistic regimes that have tainted human history, and betray a frightening undercurrent of hate, anger, and intolerance. Oh! The pathetic emptiness and lonliness of these two self-proclaimed "atheists", Horne and Benham.
But Horne and Benham want to be taken seriously? How deep does depravity reach?
A fragment of the Dead Sea Scrolls.
In their haste to criticize and sully, they again cut a portrait of two ridiculous blabbers: Wouldn't these two self-agrandizing linguists and eclectic, albeit unsolicited, commentators on everything and everyone recognize that the Psalms (Hebrew: Tehilim, תהילים, or "praises") of the Book of Psalms of the Old Testiment are initially capitalized and the psalms from the St Agnes site are lower case initals? And what about the disclaimer that Benham himself quotes:
"The ten psalms below represent a collection of psalms written by members of the St. Agnes Charismatic Prayer Group ... They have been numbered 151 to 160 and are not to be confused with the Book of Psalms".
So what's your point Mr Horne, Mr Benham? Are you unaware that a psalm (note the lower case initial) is defined as "a sacred song or hymn; any sacred song used to praise the deity"? And a Psalm (note the upper case initial) is "any of the songs, hymns, or prayers contained in the Book of Psalms" or--with a lower case initial letter--is "a metric version or paraphrase of any of these; a poem of a similar nature." Quite frankly, who on Earth really give a nick whether you are an atheist or anything else? Who cares about your silly commentaries and your pseudo-scholarship? But hands off religiosity and sprituality--they're human experiences atheists are incapable of comprehening, much less appreciating.
Mr Horne, Mr Benham: Your silly self-descriptions and affectations are very entertaining though, if one appreciates the entertainment value of used toilet paper something that I esteem to be equivalent to your scatological musings.
For anyone who might be remotely interested in these two characters'--Horne's and Benham's-- mutual pleasuring, you can find their crapola at http://vadney-bible-quotes.blogspot.com/ ... and please don't miss the comments by Horne and Benham as they tickle each other's sagging bellies. (The comments can be found at the end of the post or click here: 10 commentaires ).
0 comments:
Post a Comment